![]() Despite the limitations of this data, some animal advocates have promoted the Link as a means of establishing new animal protection laws or expanding current laws. Research supporting the Link between bestiality and interpersonal violence is sparse, though a growing body of evidence suggests that individuals with a history of bestiality may be at risk of engaging in various other problematic sexual behaviors. ĭespite the long-standing recognition of human–animal sexual activity and the evolution of legal mechanisms to regulate the behavior, research on bestiality is limited. Today, most jurisdictions in the United States proscribe bestiality, but laws vary widely between states. Since then, motivations for law regulating human–animal interactions, including bestiality, have included religious or moral convictions, animal rights concerns, and most recently, the Link, or the hypothesized relationship between animal cruelty and various forms of interpersonal violence. Scholars suggest that the earliest laws were established to regulate cultural concerns about community cleanliness. Though the legal response to bestiality has largely been punitive, the motivations for such regulation have changed over time. Human societies have established laws to regulate sexual acts between humans and nonhuman animals, or bestiality, beginning with the earliest recorded legal codes. This article summarizes the history of bestiality law, the current state of bestiality legislation in the United States, the body of Link-related literature on bestiality and interpersonal violence and other problematic sexual behaviors, and the empirical weaknesses and needs revealed by this legislation. The Link’s weaknesses can assist in guiding further research. Unfortunately, data supporting the Link between bestiality and interpersonal violence are limited and of questionable generalizability to the broad public. This concept, known as the Link, has served as a major motivation for advocates to promote new legislation criminalizing bestiality, to modernize old state statutes, and to expand penalties for individuals convicted of having sex with animals. Since the 1960′s, a growing body of literature has developed suggesting that individuals who harm animals may also interpersonally offend. have been outdated and vague and have utilized moralistic terminology. Until recently, however, many laws in the U.S. In the 1800′s, Henry Bergh imported the animal welfare approach to the United States, which modernized the legislative treatment of animals in the country. In the early American colonies, religious prohibitions against bestiality provided the grounds for punishing those who engaged in such acts. ![]() Societies have proscribed bestiality, or sex between humans and nonhuman animals, since the earliest recorded legal codes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |